After the founding of the Republic of China, it had
strengthened the administration over Tibet on the basis of
the established practices of the Yuan, Ming and Qing
dynasties and also specially set up the corresponding
government organs of administration over Tibet. On July 19,
1912, the Central Government decided to set up the Bureau
for Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs (renamed later as the Yuan
for Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs). It was clearly
stipulated that the Bureau was directly under the leadership
of the Premier. All the matters relevant to the Mongolian
and the Tibet regions should be handled by the Bureau (or
Yuan) or transmitted to the Premier for making final
decisions.
After the founding of the
Nationalist Government in Nanjing, the Commission for
Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs was set up to take charge of
the administrative affairs in the Mongolian and the Tibet
regions as well as the other ethnic areas in 1929 so as to
further strengthen the administration over the Tibet region.
After the founding of the Commission for
Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs, it handled the matters of
establishing three Tibetan Affairs offices in Nanjing,
Beiping and Xikang(Khams) and of appropriating expenses for
them submitted by the general representative of Tibet in
Nanjing Kunchok Jungnas in 1930. The Commission also
examined and approved the selection of the directors, deputy
directors of the three Offices as well as the proposed
organizational outlines of the Offices. Afterwards, in view
of the Tibet regional conditions, the Commission formulated
three statutes successively:
On January 8,
1934, the Commission made public the Measures on the
Respects-paying to the Central Government by the
Representatives of the Dalai and the Panchen. There were
seven articles in the Measures. It stipulated that the Dalai
Lama and the Panchen Erdeni should in turn send a
representative to Nanjing to report the situation of
administration of Tibet every year. The representative
should bring with him the certificate of appointment and
rank or title as well as his curriculum vitae to report for
duty to the Commission at the designated date every year. It
also stipulated in explicit terms that the representative
would pay homage to Dr. Sun Yat-sen's Mausoleum, call on the
Chairman of the Executive Yuan, have an audience with the
President of the Nationalist Government, report the border
administration to the Central Government. The Central
Government would announce the administrative policy and
other matters.
On February 10, 1936, the
Measures on Rewards and Punishments for the Lamas were
published. There were twenty-five articles in it. The
requirements and the ranks of promotion for the rewarded or
punished Lamas were all specifically stipulated.
On September 24, 1938, the Commission issued
the Measures on the Reincarnation of the Lamas. There were
thirteen articles in total. It clearly stipulated that the
reincarnation of the Dalai Lamas, the Panchen Erdenis,
Jetsun Dampa Hutuktus and the reincarnation of the Hutuktus,
Nomihans and Panditas in various places ager their demise
should be reported to the highest administrative organ in
the locality and transmit to the Commission for the record.
After the discovery of the reincarnate soul boy, it should
first report to the highest administrative organ in the
locality and then convey it to the Commission for
investigation and check, then conducting lot-drawing
respectively... etc.
In addition, the demise
of the thirteenth Dalai Lama, the ninth Panchen Lama and
paying religious tribute and offering condolences to them;
the search for the reincarnate soul boys; the enthronement
and title-granting to the Dalai Lama, the Panchen Erdeni and
other high-rankiqg monk officials; the examination and
approval of Rating and Takdra as Tibetan regents as well as
the appointment, removal arid rewards to the Tibetan
officials, clerical and secular, etc., all the
above-mentioned matters were specifically held responsible
for and handled by the Commission for Mongolian and Tibetan
Affairs.
Since the founding of the Commission
for Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs up to 1949, it had all
along carried out its duty. The contact and connections with
the Commission for Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs had never
interrupted relating to the affairs between the Tibetan
local government and the Central Government. It may be asked
that if Tibet were "an independent country" at
that time, then, how were the expenses of any country's
diplomatic organs on earth obliged to apply for
appropriation and borne by the resident country? Moreover,
according to international practice, the inter-state affairs
were represented and handled usually through diplomatic
channels, but the important matters of the Tibet region were
handled through the Commission for Mongolian and Tibetan
Affairs, not by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Was that
the acceptable normal way to carry on contacts between
"an independent country" and another sovereign
state?
Past events remain fresh in people's
memory, Just as Francis Bacon, the British philosopher in
the sixteenth century, said: "Histories make men
wise," as we look back the values contained in the
above-mentioned historical facts, we are convinced that
through the review of the above-mentioned historical facts,
the readers would be able to reach new consensus with us;
that is, with the lapse of history, the close ties and the
compatriotic affection between the Tibet region and the
Central Government as well as the Tibetan people and the
people in the interior of the motherland established for
several hundred years could only be the longer, the stronger
and the more consolidated. They could by no means be
suddenly severed by the development of certain historical
event or the outbreak of social transformations, even to the
extent of all gone, nothing left.
|